Logo MASTR ufficiale MASTR
Menu
Leggi la pubblicazione

Exchange e custodia

One of the ideas that would be good for crypto L2.

#CEX s should have to pay for the privilege to list long-term tokens. Not the other way around. They already make billions in fees.

Le pubblicazioni originali sono in inglese. La navigazione è disponibile in sette lingue.

01

Originale su X ↗

One of the ideas that would be good for crypto L2.

Too many idiots just want to suck money out of the space.

Wouldn’t it be nice if we flip the script? 👇

#CEX s should have to pay for the privilege to list long-term tokens. Not the other way around. They already make billions in fees.

If a token survives for months, then it should be the CEXs begging for a listing, not projects throwing money at shady exchanges.

Examples of how it could work:

1. Instead of projects begging for listings, CEXs compete to onboard strong tokens by paying for the right and gaining users + volume.

2. Long-term survival = listing rights gifted to holders as recognition of trust.

3. Communities, not backroom deals, should decide which tokens earn visibility.

4. CEXs could share part of their trading fees directly with token holders as “listing dividends.”

5. Projects that survive 6–12+ months without rugs automatically unlock rewards from the CEX treasury.

6. Influencers must stake collateral before promoting tokens – if the project rugs, their stake flows back to the community.

7. CEX dashboards could rank tokens by survival time, giving older, proven tokens free visibility while hiding new spam coins.

8. Shilling platforms become pay-to-post zones – removing 99% of low-effort scammers.

9. CEXs that list rugs too often lose credibility points in an on-chain reputation system, forcing them to be selective.

10. Survival = legitimacy → the longer a project lasts, the more rights and exposure it earns automatically.

We need to end the model where exchanges and influencers profit while investors bleed.
Shift the cost.

Flip the power. Make them pay.

Ricerche correlate

Exchange e custodia

BitMart: the history behind the wind-down

A review of BitMart’s earlier disputes, security incidents and withdrawal concerns alongside its 2026 closure announcement.

Articoli originali11 min
MASTR

Sostieni la ricerca indipendente

Le indagini, le prove originali e le guide sono accessibili gratuitamente. Le donazioni volontarie contribuiscono a finanziare la ricerca e a mantenere disponibili gli strumenti MASTR.

Apri wallet