Logótipo oficial do MASTR MASTR
Menu

Contas inteligentes e governação

EIP-6963: choosing between browser wallets without trusting the icon

Provider discovery solves a coordination problem; names and icons remain self-reported.

Atualizado em 30 de setembro de 2026 · MASTR Labs

Os artigos e gráficos técnicos estão em inglês. A navegação está disponível em 7 idiomas.

Guias de referência
  1. Why one injected provider was awkward
  2. An announcement is not an identity certificate
  3. Discovery is not permission
  4. What to examine when something feels wrong
  5. Exemplo concreto
  6. Fontes e originais

Why one injected provider was awkward

Several wallet extensions historically competed to expose a provider through window.ethereum. Loading order could determine which one a site saw, producing confusing connections for users with multiple wallets installed. EIP-6963 defines event-based discovery so a page can learn about several injected providers and let the user choose. It preserves the underlying provider interface rather than inventing a new chain protocol. 1

An announcement is not an identity certificate

Providers announce information including a name, icon, session identifier and reverse-domain-style identifier. These fields are useful for presenting options, but they are self-attested. The standard explicitly warns that provider metadata can imitate another wallet. A familiar logo inside a connection chooser is not independent proof that the expected extension produced it.

Discovery is not permission

Finding a provider should not be confused with receiving account access, signing a message or authorising a transfer. Those are later interactions with their own consent and security requirements. A well-designed chooser preserves the user’s selected wallet and makes a changed account or chain visible. It should not silently substitute the last provider to announce itself. 2

What to examine when something feels wrong

Check the installed extension through the browser’s own extension management, the selected account and the destination website. A changed icon or duplicate name deserves investigation, but does not by itself prove theft. For developers, render provider imagery as images rather than active markup and treat metadata as untrusted input. For users, the meaningful review happens again in the wallet’s own signing interface.

Discovery is only the first step
Diagrama explicativo. Abrir em tamanho completo. Credits ↗ Wallet metadata is self-reported, not an identity certificate.

Exemplo concreto

Two wallet extensions are installed. A site displays both providers and you select one. That solves selection. It does not mean a later request from the site is safe; the chosen wallet still needs to show what account, chain and action you are authorising.

Fontes e originais

  1. EIP-6963: multi-provider discovery
  2. EIP-1193: Ethereum provider API

Continuar a leitura

Contas inteligentes e governação →

MASTR

Apoiar a investigação independente

As investigações, as provas originais e os guias são de acesso livre. Os donativos voluntários ajudam a financiar a investigação e a manter disponíveis as ferramentas MASTR.

Abrir carteira