Recherches MASTR
MASTR's Crypto Survival Guide
The four-part guide connects market structure, KOL incentives, safety claims and operational decisions.
Les enquêtes et les fiches de référence sont publiées en anglais. La navigation est disponible en sept langues.
Market structure
The first panel asks readers to identify why a token exists, who receives value from its use and how much liquidity supports an exit. A high valuation cannot answer those questions. Supply releases, treasury needs and market-maker arrangements can affect the position a buyer actually holds.
An effective review turns the panel's questions into a short record: the exact mint, circulating supply definition, next release dates, largest relevant pools and the parties able to change the system. The ANSEM workbook and the TRUMP pool study show why this record is worth building.
The KOL business model
The second panel identifies compensation beyond a visible cash payment: discounted allocations, advisory stakes, retainers, referrals and access to later deals. A disclosure that someone owns a token does not describe their entry terms or restrictions on selling it.
Apply the same questions to hosts, moderators and apparently independent commentators. Their access to a project can be commercially valuable even where no payment has been demonstrated. Do not turn the possibility of a conflict into a claim that a particular person committed fraud. Use the KOL allocation guide to identify the missing facts.
Safety claims
The third panel challenges broad conclusions drawn from scanner scores, audit logos, locked liquidity and renounced ownership. Each can describe a real but narrow property. None proves all the people, permissions and economic relationships behind a project are safe.
Read the scope and date. Determine which role was renounced, which position was locked and which deployment was reviewed. A green indicator is useful only when the reader understands what was checked and what was omitted. The audit guide develops that distinction.
Operations and exposure
The final panel focuses on custody, signatures, stablecoin backing, bridge dependencies and the size of a possible loss. It also asks who pays an advertised yield. An attractive token review cannot repair a compromised device or make an impossible exit executable.
The original four-panel download is included below. These are research questions and practical cautions, not a trading signal or a promise that completing a checklist prevents every loss. Use the linked articles to examine the underlying mechanics in more detail.
Sources
Recherche vérifiée le 5 septembre 2026. Historical cases retain the date and legal status of the cited record.