官方的 MASTR 标志 MASTR 支持这项工作
目录
← 知识库首页

Technical reference

ERC-165: interface support is a claim, not a security certificate

A contract recognising a function set does not prove that its implementation behaves honestly.

Source-based reference · Updated 12 September 2026

研究文章和参考条目以英语发布。导航提供七种语言。

本文目录
  1. What the query asks
  2. What it cannot establish
  3. Use it as a starting point
  4. Sources

What the query asks

ERC-165 defines a way to ask whether a contract supports an interface identified by a four-byte value. Interface IDs are derived from function selectors. This lets an integrator distinguish compatible interfaces without guessing from a contract's name.

What it cannot establish

The response says nothing by itself about economic safety, administrative powers or whether every implementation detail complies with the claimed interface. Malicious code can answer a compatibility query while performing unsafe actions elsewhere. The recognised function set is not a review of all reachable code.

Use it as a starting point

Confirm the return value and behaviour expected by the interface-detection procedure, then test the functions the integration will actually use. Include adversarial implementations in tests rather than only the popular reference contract. A compatibility badge in a UI should not be presented as an audit badge; they answer different questions.

Sources

相关阅读

MASTR

支持独立研究

这里的调查、原始证据和指南均可免费阅读。自愿捐赠帮助支付研究成本,让 MASTR 能够继续提供工具。

打开钱包