官方的 MASTR 标志 MASTR 支持这项工作
目录
← 知识库首页

KOLs & promotion

Similar balances do not prove coordinated entry

Tables sorted by current holdings can create a misleading visual pattern.

Research guide · 1 min read

研究文章和参考条目以英语发布。导航提供七种语言。

本文目录
  1. The FOMO example

For one token at one price, current position value equals token balance multiplied by the current price. Sorting a table by value therefore also sorts it by balance. Adjacent rows are likely to look similar even if the owners entered at very different times and prices.

The FOMO example

MASTR's FOMO/MEME dossier found a relatively narrow range of displayed balances alongside a roughly 250-fold range in displayed average-entry market capitalisation. The similarity that made the screenshot visually persuasive did not support the accusation that everyone bought on the same terms.

Before inferring coordination, identify what the columns mean and whether they show initial buys, current holdings, net positions or estimated average entry. Rounded values can hide further differences. Transfers and partial sales also change the meaning of a current balance.

A screenshot can provide a lead or help match a known account. Attribution requires additional evidence. Preserve the full image and its timestamp; cropping away headings or sorting controls can change the apparent meaning. Read the case study for the actual finding and its limits.

来源

  1. MASTR: FOMO / MEME public-evidence dossier, 4 September 2026

资料核对日期:2026年9月5日. Historical cases retain the date and legal status of the cited record.

相关阅读

MASTR

支持独立研究

这里的调查、原始证据和指南均可免费阅读。自愿捐赠帮助支付研究成本,让 MASTR 能够继续提供工具。

打开钱包