LAPTOP: 2 connected claims, 647,428.93 USDC in receipts

Claim wallet A

Wallet 0x8dac47d2cde81dce7e3d268347eebf4fe714a18d received 4,276.66 LAPTOP from claim contract 0x38e33d0471c656f15e2a98f76f4b7ba664cca4e8 at 12:13 UTC. The claim carried no ETH value and its decoded token events contained no purchase payment.

At 12:18, it disposed of 0.5 LAPTOP and received 0.028930709293269234 ETH. A minute later it sold the remaining 4,276.16 LAPTOP for 404,247.056580 USDC. A separate 1,013.150517 USDC routing payment did not reach the subject wallet. Its reported receipt already excludes that payment; subtracting it again would understate the result.

The 404,247.056580 USDC subsequently moved to another address and was converted into a combined 161.115082527259735708 ETH. That ETH represents the same money after conversion. Adding both amounts as independent gains would double count the proceeds.

Claim wallet B

Wallet A sent 0.02 ETH to 0xc275c0b8765b73d2308965e7d216e3299bd9b591 at 12:24:09 UTC. Fourteen seconds later, wallet B claimed 4,276.66 LAPTOP from the same contract in its transaction with nonce 0. It then sold the full amount and received 243,181.878207 USDC.

Together the wallets sold all 8,553.32 claimed tokens for 647,428.934787 USDC plus the small separate ETH receipt. Those are receipts after the routing payments excluded from the claimant balances, before gas, any eligibility costs and taxes.

The relationship that is visible

The direct ETH funding transfer is a documented financial link. Common ownership, an improper claim and insider status require additional evidence. Neither a shared claim contract nor similar allocations settles those questions. The useful finding is specific: connected wallets received claims, sold them, and moved the proceeds along identifiable routes. Read the separate allocation-ledger investigation before combining figures from different wallet groups.

来源与原始文件

• MASTR: LAPTOP independent onchain reconstruction, 9 September 2026