官方的 MASTR 标志 MASTR 支持这项工作
目录
← 知识库首页

Wallets & security

Permanent delegates: a control the holder cannot revoke

Mint-level authority changes what holding a token actually means.

Research guide · 9 September 2026 · 1 min read

研究文章和参考条目以英语发布。导航提供七种语言。

人物与项目

本文目录
  1. Follow the authority Identify the delegate and determine whether it is a key, a multisignature arrangement or a programme-controlled address. If a programme controls it, investigate that programme's upgrade authority and the instructions that exercise the delegation. A complex address does not itself demonstrate distributed control.
  2. Compare the control with the promise This mechanism may be intentional, including for regulated assets. The research question is whether the product description makes the control understandable. A claim of unrestricted holder control needs to be reconciled with an authority capable of moving or destroying that holder's tokens.
  3. Report what you can establish Record the mint configuration and the authority path at a specific slot. Do not infer that the authority has been abused merely because it exists. Distinguish capability, observed execution and alleged intent. Those 3 statements require different evidence and should never be collapsed into the same accusation.

A Token-2022 permanent delegate is a mint-level authority able to authorise transfers and burns across accounts for that mint. Individual token account owners cannot revoke that authority from their accounts. Moving tokens to a fresh wallet therefore does not remove this particular exposure.

Follow the authority Identify the delegate and determine whether it is a key, a multisignature arrangement or a programme-controlled address. If a programme controls it, investigate that programme's upgrade authority and the instructions that exercise the delegation. A complex address does not itself demonstrate distributed control.

Compare the control with the promise This mechanism may be intentional, including for regulated assets. The research question is whether the product description makes the control understandable. A claim of unrestricted holder control needs to be reconciled with an authority capable of moving or destroying that holder's tokens.

Report what you can establish Record the mint configuration and the authority path at a specific slot. Do not infer that the authority has been abused merely because it exists. Distinguish capability, observed execution and alleged intent. Those 3 statements require different evidence and should never be collapsed into the same accusation.

来源

Solana documentation · permanent-delegate

Technical reference checked 9 September 2026. The review questions are editorial analysis, not findings about a named project.

相关阅读

MASTR

支持独立研究

这里的调查、原始证据和指南均可免费阅读。自愿捐赠帮助支付研究成本,让 MASTR 能够继续提供工具。

打开钱包