官方的 MASTR 标志 MASTR
菜单
阅读文章

意见领袖与推广

Worse, many of them probably never even understood it in the first place.

Holding 200k (More likely the money skimmed from followers) on a CEX is proof enough for me that many of these big accounts out there do not take sovereignty and self custody seriously.

原文为英语,导航提供七种语言。

01

查看 X 原帖 ↗

Holding 200k (More likely the money skimmed from followers) on a CEX is proof enough for me that many of these big accounts out there do not take sovereignty and self custody seriously.

Worse, many of them probably never even understood it in the first place.

But somehow hundreds of people will still rush in to defend them, buy their memecoin, fund their latest nonsense, or act like these accounts are some kind of sacred authority in crypto.

People preach decentralization all day, then worship the exact people who treat the whole thing like a personal ATM.

But God forbid the token of an actual hard working builder is not sitting at millions in market cap.

Then the crypto bros suddenly become world class critics, talking down on it without understanding a single thing, not even realizing that they are the ones getting everything wrong.

They throw money at KOL coins who are not here for crypto but for self enrichement, recycled scams and follower extraction, but when someone is actually building something real and with products, they act like market cap is the only proof of value.

This space rewards noise, not work.

相关研究

意见领袖与推广

From decentralisation to attention capture

How financial incentives, manufactured attention and platform design shape participation in crypto, with the original evidence and source list.

原创文章23 min
MASTR

支持独立研究

这里的调查、原始证据和指南均可免费阅读。自愿捐赠帮助支付研究成本,让 MASTR 能够继续提供工具。

打开钱包