官方的 MASTR 标志 MASTR
菜单
阅读文章

市场结构

ANSEM creator fees and liquidity: what the transfer establishes

That is at least a measurable step in the right direction, and deeper liquidity is obviously better than thin pools where every larger sell turns into chaos.

原文为英语,导航提供七种语言。

01

查看 X 原帖 ↗

Good to see creator fees being put back from @blknoiz06 into $ANSEM liquidity.

That is at least a measurable step in the right direction, and deeper liquidity is obviously better than thin pools where every larger sell turns into chaos.

I am still sceptical of the whole “bagworker” incentive model, because paying people to push content can very quickly turn into coordinated exit liquidity marketing if the incentives are not handled carefully.

More liquidity helps.

But the real test is whether this becomes something useful and durable, or just a better organised attention machine.

Curious to see what comes out of it.

Liquidity is the first serious part.

What gets built around it will decide whether this becomes interesting, or just another bull market cult with better branding.

I remain sceptical, and honestly a bit irritated that what feels like half the space is jumping onto KOL shitcoins instead of supporting utility projects, or at least established memecoins with some history behind them.

We will see. But I am not switching my brain off just because the chart is green and the timeline is excited.

提及的账号

查找所选文章中提及的 X 账号。被提及不代表受到指控或获得推荐。

@blknoiz06

相关研究

市场结构

Rising prices, FOMO and retail losses

A long-form examination of FOMO, influencer narratives, speculative booms and the outcomes faced by retail traders.

原创文章27 min
MASTR

支持独立研究

这里的调查、原始证据和指南均可免费阅读。自愿捐赠帮助支付研究成本,让 MASTR 能够继续提供工具。

打开钱包