Onchain investigations
GEEK: MASTR’s archived follow-up on supply and valuation GEEK: MASTR’s archived follow-up on supply and valuation. Dated original source, with context and links.
MASTR First published 24 Mar 2025 1 min · 72 words The original publications are in English. Navigation is available in seven languages.
Commentary & rants Archived publication in the author’s original wording. Claims, figures and opinions belong to the date shown; inclusion does not establish them as independently verified facts.
The reading-edition title is editorial; the source text below retains its original wording.
Editorial context Historical warning in the author’s original wording. The holdings, timing and attribution claims refer to the source date and have not been independently reconstructed for this edition. Concentration, a shared funder, same-block purchases or reused branding can be risk indicators, but none alone establishes fraud or common ownership. This page is not a current token rating or a legal finding.
$GEEK – another example of an ultra slow rug. We were the first to warn – with clear arguments and evidence.
> >90% of supply bundled. But people attacked us, mocked us, and now most of them have silently deleted their comments.
The CA was shilled by the team itself around $4M MC. Now it's sitting at $160k MC. Let that sink in.
#Supply control is bad and only bad.
#scam #scamalert
Original attachments · 2 These attachments are linked to their original location. A local copy is not available in this reading edition.