Official MASTR logo MASTR
Menu
Read the publication

Networks & infrastructure

Solana: paid promotion · 12 Aug 2026

A routing failure at TeraSwitch knocked 28.83% of all staked SOL offline at once. Once delinquent stake crosses roughly 33.34%, Solana can no longer finalize blocks.

The original publications are in English. Navigation is available in seven languages.

01

Original on X ↗

By the way....Solana came roughly 20 million SOL away from losing finality today...

A routing failure at TeraSwitch knocked 28.83% of all staked SOL offline at once. Once delinquent stake crosses roughly 33.34%, Solana can no longer finalize blocks.

Around 90 validators were affected.

The ugly part is the infrastructure concentration behind it!

TeraSwitch’s AS20326 was hosting about 118.9 million SOL, or 27.34% of total stake. Roughly 94% of that stake disappeared from the network simultaneously after a bad route propagated through its infrastructure.

The failure spread across locations including London, Amsterdam, Dublin, Frankfurt, Singapore and Tokyo. Some validators stayed offline for around 33 minutes.

And the backup story was not exactly reassuring either.

Marinade found that 59 validators representing about 80.2 million SOL came back in roughly the same window, while only 3 of 74 operators it could evaluate appeared to fail over cleanly to backup infrastructure.

Transactions kept finalizing.

But one routing mistake at one infrastructure provider managed to remove almost 29% of stake from the network at the same time.

Read it again.

You can have hundreds of validators and still have a very real concentration problem if half the supposedly independent infrastructure ultimately depends on the same networks, datacenters and routing providers.

That is what nearly bit Solana today.

02

Original on X ↗

4.5 percentage points of stake away from losing finality.

But what would that actually have meant?

Once more than 1/3 of the stake is offline, Solana no longer has the 2/3 supermajority required to finalize new blocks.

Transactions might still be processed temporarily, but they could no longer be considered irreversible.

Exchanges, bridges and other infrastructure would likely have paused deposits and withdrawals until finality returned.

It would not have meant lost funds or a dead blockchain.

But operationally, Solana would have been in a very uncomfortable state until enough stake came back online to restore consensus.

Those 4.5 percentage points mattered. A lot.

Related research

Networks & infrastructure

A map of the Solana ecosystem

A detailed map of Solana’s infrastructure, from validator clients and RPCs to wallets, liquidity, security and payments.

Original articles15 min
MASTR

Support independent research

The investigations, original evidence and guides here are free to read. Voluntary donations help fund the research and keep MASTR’s tools available.

Open wallet