官方的 MASTR 标志 MASTR
菜单
目录
← 知识库首页

Chains & networks

Layer 2: five separate questions

Settlement, proofs, data availability, sequencing and upgrades should not be compressed into one safety label.

Network guide · 1 min read

研究文章和参考条目以英语发布。导航提供七种语言。

本文目录
  1. Compare the components

A layer-2 system can process activity away from Ethereum's base layer while relying on it for part of settlement or security. Implementations differ. Publishing a state commitment is not the same as publishing all the data needed to reconstruct that state.

Compare the components

Four questions for a rollup
教学示意图:简化机制并注明假设,不构成特定事件的证据。 打开完整图表 ↗

Rollups: execution is only one part of the security model →

Ask where transaction data is available, how invalid claims are rejected, who orders transactions, who can change the contracts and how a user exits during an outage. A strong answer on one component does not settle the others.

For example, a functioning proof system may protect validity while a central sequencer delays inclusion. A bridge may require a waiting period even when the application presents an immediate confirmation. Administrative changes can alter assumptions after a review.

Check the current deployed configuration and the date of any risk assessment. A roadmap item is not an active protection. Arbitrum, Optimism and Base illustrate why chain-specific documentation matters.

来源

  1. Ethereum: layer 2
  2. Optimism: fault proofs

资料核对日期:2026年9月5日. Historical cases retain the date and legal status of the cited record.

相关阅读

MASTR

支持独立研究

这里的调查、原始证据和指南均可免费阅读。自愿捐赠帮助支付研究成本,让 MASTR 能够继续提供工具。

打开钱包