官方的 MASTR 标志 MASTR 支持这项工作
目录
← 知识库首页

KOLs & promotion

Survivorship bias in calls, rankings and research

A sample containing only visible winners cannot measure the odds faced by a new participant.

Research guide · 1 min read

研究文章和参考条目以英语发布。导航提供七种语言。

本文目录
  1. Define the population first

An account can appear consistently successful after deleting failed predictions or discussing only tokens that remained active. A leaderboard can exclude closed accounts. A token study can analyse only assets meeting a performance threshold. Each selection changes the conclusion the data can support.

Define the population first

Write down which calls, accounts or tokens should have been included before looking at their outcomes. Record the period, entry rules, exit rules and treatment of missing data. Keep inactive and failed examples when they belong to that population.

MASTR's July essay explicitly cautions against interpreting a manipulation indicator found within a selected high-performing sample as the fraud rate of all memecoins. The denominator is part of the claim.

For a promoter's record, reconstruct all recommendations over a fixed period rather than accepting a collection of winners. For copy trading, include the trades a follower missed and the transactions that failed. A result may still be impressive after these corrections; the point is to measure the result that was actually promised.

来源

  1. MASTR: copy-trading research snapshot, 9 August 2026
  2. MASTR: Crypto Survival Guide, four original panels
  3. A Midsummer Meme's Dream: research on memecoin manipulation indicators

资料核对日期:2026年9月5日. Historical cases retain the date and legal status of the cited record.

相关阅读

MASTR

支持独立研究

这里的调查、原始证据和指南均可免费阅读。自愿捐赠帮助支付研究成本,让 MASTR 能够继续提供工具。

打开钱包