官方的 MASTR 标志 MASTR
菜单
阅读文章

意见领袖与推广

How user demand rewards extraction

The industry likes to blame external enemies because that preserves the self image of a revolution. But the most important force shaping crypto has always been internal selection pressure.

Original publication · 2 Jan 2026. Figures, claims and opinions reflect the original publication date.

原文为英语,导航提供七种语言。

01

查看 X 原帖 ↗

How Crypto Users Dug Their Own Grave And Keep Digging:

Crypto did not get captured only by governments, institutions, or exchanges.
It got captured by its own demand.

Not demand for sovereignty. Demand for adrenaline.

The industry likes to blame external enemies because that preserves the self image of a revolution. But the most important force shaping crypto has always been internal selection pressure.

Users rewarded the fastest dopamine and the cheapest stories. So the ecosystem evolved to produce exactly that.

That which sounds simple and promises a lot.

🔺 1. The market learned what you pay for:

In any market, suppliers adapt to what buyers actually purchase, not what buyers claim they want.

If users say they want decentralisation but buy whatever pumps hardest, the market will allocate talent and capital toward pump production.
Not infrastructure. Not safety. Not resilience.

Over time, the ecosystem becomes an optimisation machine for attention extraction. That is what most tokens are. Instruments designed to convert attention into liquidity, and liquidity into exit.

Builders can put 70k dollars or more into their RESL products and actually deliver, but people would rather buy tokens where 70k is pumped in by the team, with no product, no foundation, no knowledge, and no hard work.

🔺 2. Adverse selection turned crypto into a lemon market:

When buyers cannot reliably distinguish quality from fraud, the market drifts toward low quality. This is classic adverse selection.

Serious teams carry higher costs. Compliance. Engineering. Security. Time. Scammers carry lower costs and higher speed. In an attention driven market, speed wins distribution.

Result: the visible surface of crypto becomes dominated by projects that look good enough for long enough. Not projects that are good.

🔺 3. The incentives are structurally anti truth:

Most participants are not paid to be right. They are paid to be early, loud, and aligned with the trade.

If you hold a token, your short term incentive is to market it, not to evaluate it. If you are an influencer, your incentive is engagement, not accuracy. If you are a founder, your incentive is narrative momentum, not disclosure.

Truth is slow. Liquidity is fast.

So the ecosystem converges toward performative certainty. Confidence becomes a financial instrument.

🔺 4. Variable rewards hijacked behaviour:

Crypto markets provide the most powerful reinforcement schedule known in behavioural science: variable ratio rewards.

Unpredictable jackpots create compulsive repetition. The brain does not need fundamentals. It needs occasional wins to justify infinite attempts.

That is why people keep chasing memes after getting wrecked. Not because they are stupid. Because the system is tuned to create habit loops. Chart checking, community hype, fear of missing out, and social proof form a closed circuit.

The user thinks they are investing. The system is training them.

🔺 5. Social identity replaced due diligence:

Once someone ties a token to identity, rational critique becomes psychologically expensive.

If a project becomes a tribe, then questioning it risks social exclusion and self contradiction. Humans avoid that pain. So they defend the token, attack critics, and reinterpret warning signals as enemies.

This is how scams survive without needing sophisticated exploits. The community becomes the security layer protecting the scam.

🔺6. Market cap is the most successful illusion in crypto:

Market cap multiplies the last traded price by the total supply. It implicitly pretends the entire supply could be sold at that price.

In thin liquidity markets, this is mathematically meaningless as a measure of realizable value. Yet it is used as the primary status metric because it is easy to screenshot and it stimulates greed.

Users rewarded the metric. So founders engineered around it. Low float, skewed liquidity, aggressive incentives, staged unlocks, and controlled sell pressure create impressive numbers with minimal real demand.

The grave was dug with a calculator.

🔺 7. The tragedy of the commons killed the culture:

Each individual actor gains by extracting from the system. Launch a token fast. Shill hard. Exit. Repeat.

The collective cost is the destruction of trust, which raises the cost of capital for everyone and invites harsher regulation. But no single actor bears the full cost of that decay, so extraction remains rational at the individual level.

This is why crypto keeps recreating the same failure. Every single day.

🔺 8. Moral hazard became normal:

When losses can be externalised, risk explodes.

In crypto, founders externalise downside to holders through unlocks and treasuries. Exchanges externalise systemic risk to users through opaque risk management and liquidation mechanics. Influencers externalise reputational risk because attention cycles move on.

The user is the sink. Everyone else is the faucet.

🔺 9. The final betrayal is psychological:

Most people did not lose money only because of scams. They lost because they adopted a belief that markets are moral.

They are not.

Markets reward what works, not what is right. If deception produces liquidity, deception will spread. If empty promises produce engagement, empty promises will multiply. If speed beats safety, safety will disappear.

Crypto users helped select for this world every time they chose the pump over the product, the story over the audit, the influencer over the evidence, and the screenshot over the cash flow.

🔺 10. The grave is still being dug, daily:

Look at the dominant behaviours that persist even after years of public failures.

People still equate hype with legitimacy.
They still confuse activity with progress.
They still treat anonymity as edgy rather than risky.
They still measure success by price, not by survivability.
They still outsource judgement to crowds that are financially conflicted.

This is why the ecosystem cannot stabilise itself. The feedback loop is intact.

If you want a scientific summary of the entire pathology, it is this:

Crypto became an attention market first, and a technology market second. In attention markets, the optimal product is the one that maximises arousal and shareability, not the one that maximises truth.

The industry evolved to fit the incentives users kept feeding it.

And unless behaviour changes, 2026 will not be a turning point. It will be a cleaner version of the same extraction, wrapped in better design, better compliance language, and better psychology.

Because the grave is not dug by scammers alone.

It is dug by demand.

Attachment to the original X post
Attachment to the original X post 查看完整尺寸图片 ↗

02

查看 X 原帖 ↗

The grave is not dug by scammers alone.

It is dug by dopamine. By lottery charts. By simple stories that promise everything and require nothing.

If you trade Pumpfun extraction garbage, Trump coins, KOL shills, or Binance’s $ASTER just to name a few, you did not only lose money.

The moment you bought, you funded the extraction industry and cast your vote against real builders, real products, and real work.

Honestly, I have lost hope that small, true builders will ever get a fair chance against people with massive followings and deep pockets. But what I can still do is share my observations and maybe wake up a few people.

来源与原帖

MASTR

支持独立研究

这里的调查、原始证据和指南均可免费阅读。自愿捐赠帮助支付研究成本,让 MASTR 能够继续提供工具。

打开钱包