官方的 MASTR 标志 MASTR
菜单
阅读文章

政治与利益冲突

WLFI contract controls: the September 2025 review

🚨 I analyzed the $WLFI contracts and the findings are hair-raising. The design is shockingly unprofessional for a project hyped as a $7B+ “DAO.”

原文为英语,导航提供七种语言。

01

查看 X 原帖 ↗

🚨 I analyzed the $WLFI contracts and the findings are hair-raising. The design is shockingly unprofessional for a project hyped as a $7B+ “DAO.”

The implementation contract 0x3722359be0BFEbb541Bc98AdfE1250Cd901a706c was left uninitialized for months.

On Jan-20-2025, EOA 0xaC9380e09Fe303d5860088095ED40B2A41E89915 executed initialize(), instantly seizing ownership and minting 100,000,000,000 WLFI on the logic contract.

📜 TX: 0xb1f118cc46fbfbac52f0dbcadc34bd290bca1eb645d54fa327f7cbad6666bfab

Logs confirm:
-OwnershipTransferred (0x0 → 0xaC9380e…)
-Initialized(version=1)
-Transfer (0x0 → 0xaC9380e…, 100,000,000,000 * 10^18)

A later TX 0xd59e14cbc43c9c8c2de5136ddc656304ee897ffb1a931adf4635ef1d71f1b800 moved ownership again to 0x571337409b6A6e80222Acd5C16340C969e025289.

This created a “shadow WLFI”: a token tracker at the implementation contract shows 100B supply & 1 holder.

It looks real on Etherscan, but it is not the official WLFI.

The real proxy — traded on CEX/DEX — is 0xda5e1988097297dcdc1f90d4dfe7909e847cbef6, marked as a TransparentUpgradeableProxy ❗

⚠️ Why this matters:

In proxy patterns (EIP-1967 / UUPS), leaving the logic contract uninitialized means anyone can hijack admin rights.

Once owner, an attacker can mint, freeze, or even upgrade the contract logic.

Even if proxy balances are safe, the existence of a 100B “shadow WLFI” undermines trust and confuses explorers & investors.

This is a well-documented vuln (see OpenZeppelin, 2018+) and trivial to prevent with initializer "modifiers + _disableInitializers()."

Additional $MASTR concerns:

WLFI’s proxy admin retains centralized veto and kill-switch powers, plus explicit mint/freeze rights.

Governance tokens were initially non-transferable, reducing “DAO” governance to theater.

Combined with foreign and criminal capital inflows (Justin Sun, Abu Dhabi entities) and now amateur contract hygiene, the project looks like politics wrapped in DeFi cosmetics.

For a $7B+ project to ship with uninitialized contracts, let a random EOA mint 100B fake supply months before launch, and never disclose it →

......It’s @realDonaldTrump Inc. on-chain

Sloppy.

02

查看 X 原帖 ↗

I know not many will see this because it’s not a one-liner, or someone else will pick it up, go viral and suddenly everyone will talk about it, but my followers should know this.

提及的账号

查找所选文章中提及的 X 账号。被提及不代表受到指控或获得推荐。

@realdonaldtrump

相关研究

MASTR

支持独立研究

这里的调查、原始证据和指南均可免费阅读。自愿捐赠帮助支付研究成本,让 MASTR 能够继续提供工具。

打开钱包