Official MASTR logo MASTR Support the work
Contents
← Wiki home

Blockchain fundamentals

Proof of stake: agreement has rules, participants and penalties

Validator activity explains chain agreement, not the honesty of every application.

Blockchain foundation · 1 min read

Research articles and reference entries are published in English. Navigation is available in seven languages.

People & projects

In this article
  1. Participation and agreement
  2. Ask where concentration sits
  3. Sources and originals

Participation and agreement

Ethereum's proof-of-stake system uses validators that stake ETH and take part in proposing and attesting to blocks. Protocol rules govern selection, rewards and penalties. Some prohibited behaviours can lead to slashing; ordinary downtime and a slashable violation are different events.

The security model concerns agreement over valid chain history. It does not certify token marketing or guarantee that an application lacks a harmful administrator role.

Ask where concentration sits

Stake distribution, operating infrastructure and software diversity concern different dependencies. Many accounts may rely on a smaller number of service operators. Conversely, counting organisations alone does not identify every validator's effective stake.

Treat decentralisation as a set of measurable questions. Who can propose, attest, upgrade application code or restrict a frontend? Which failures are correlated? A protocol may distribute one decision while an application centralises another. Connect the control analysis with governance before turning a validator count into a safety verdict.

Sources and originals

Related reading

foundations

Proof-of-work mining

Miners propose blocks whose hashes satisfy a target while nodes validate every rule.

MASTR

Support independent research

The investigations, original evidence and guides here are free to read. Voluntary donations help fund the research and keep MASTR’s tools available.

Open wallet