Official MASTR logo MASTR Support the work
Contents
← Wiki home

KOLs & promotion

Kim Kardashian and EthereumMax

A documented paid-promotion settlement, with the payment and legal outcome kept explicit.

Case history · SEC settlement, 3 October 2022 · 1 min read

Research articles and reference entries are published in English. Navigation is available in seven languages.

People & projects

In this article
  1. The documented payment
  2. Why the disclosure mattered

The documented payment

The SEC found that Kim Kardashian received $250,000 to publish an Instagram post about EMAX tokens without disclosing that payment. On 3 October 2022 it announced a settlement of $1.26 million, including a penalty, disgorgement and interest. Kardashian settled without admitting or denying the findings and agreed not to promote crypto asset securities for three years.

Why the disclosure mattered

The financial relationship was directly relevant to how followers evaluated the post. Fame did not establish technical due diligence or the suitability of the asset. A link to instructions for buying the token made the post part of a purchase path, not merely a detached comment about technology.

This case is about the documented promotion and settlement. It should not be rewritten as a criminal conviction or proof that every person discussing EMAX was paid. When assessing another endorsement, ask who paid, how much, in which asset and under which terms. See paid promotion for the broader mechanism.

Sources

  1. SEC: Kim Kardashian EthereumMax settlement, 3 October 2022

Research checked 5 September 2026. Historical cases retain the date and legal status of the cited record.

Related reading

MASTR

Support independent research

The investigations, original evidence and guides here are free to read. Voluntary donations help fund the research and keep MASTR’s tools available.

Open wallet