Official MASTR logo MASTR Support the work
Contents
← Wiki home

MASTR research

LAPTOP, TRUMP and MELANIA: which connections were established?

MASTR's 9 September comparison distinguishes a deliberate commercial link from an unproven shared launch team.

MASTR link analysis · snapshot 9 September 2026 · 2 min read

Research articles and reference entries are published in English. Navigation is available in seven languages.

People & projects

In this article
  1. The strongest connection was public
  2. The documented organisations
  3. Shared infrastructure is weak attribution
  4. An unresolved development record
  5. Sources and originals

The strongest connection was public

The archived analysis identified a direct TRUMP connection in LAPTOP's distribution design: 2% of the stated 1 billion supply, or 20 million LAPTOP, was designated for users with negative TRUMP PnL through participating platforms. Eligibility decisions could depend on those platforms' own records and rules.

That makes the TRUMP trading experience part of LAPTOP's distribution strategy. It does not establish that the same people operated both token launches. A commercial reference to another project's audience is a different relationship from shared ownership, developers or funding.

The documented organisations

The analysis recorded Phoenix Veritas Foundation, Phoenix Veritas Ventures and TTM Media Group in the LAPTOP structure, with Hunter Biden, Hervé Larren, Bryce Howarth and Luis Powery named in the examined material. It compared those names with the companies and participants publicly connected to TRUMP and MELANIA.

No supported match of the operative teams was established in that comparison. The archived LAPTOP disclosures identified GSR and G20 in market-making arrangements. That participation did not itself establish an operative role for either firm in the TRUMP or MELANIA launches.

Shared infrastructure is weak attribution

Wyoming LLC registration, a common custody provider or use of a professional token adviser can occur across unrelated projects. A registered-agent address may serve many companies. These clues become stronger only when records establish common control, ownership, financing or an actual contractual relationship relevant to the launch.

The technical comparison also differed: the LAPTOP material described a Base deployment using LayerZero OFT, while TRUMP and MELANIA launched on Solana. Different technology does not prove different people, but it weakens an argument based only on superficial similarity.

An unresolved development record

The Hacken audit referenced the repository web3-consulting/laptop. The archived investigation could not find a public repository or commit history during its review. That leaves the development attribution unresolved; it does not establish that a named rival team wrote the code.

The downloadable comparison preserves the sources, tables and snapshot. Later wallet discoveries should be evaluated against that record rather than read back into it without evidence. Continue with the transaction-level LAPTOP investigation and confidence in wallet clusters.

Sources and originals

Related reading

MASTR

Support independent research

The investigations, original evidence and guides here are free to read. Voluntary donations help fund the research and keep MASTR’s tools available.

Open wallet